From independent studios to established multi-team firms, SAMS supports diverse practices across:
Architecture
Firms
Project-driven
Teams
Design-build
Practices
Interior Design
Studios
Architecture firms
Project-driven architectural teams
Design-build practices
Interior design studios
Today, SAMS is used by 150+ architectural offices and 1100+ users across India.
Design Consortium: Nilanjan Bhowal (New Delhi)
Before SAMS: Coordination between teams, documentation,
and project tracking required a lot of manual effort and
time.
After SAMS: Centralized dashboards, structured workflows,
and better visibility into tasks and updates improved project
execution and client communication.
Key Improvements:
- Streamlined workflow & documentation
- Improved project visibility for teams
- Better client-facing interactions
- More professional project delivery
Abaxial Designs — Suparna Bhalla (New Delhi)
Before SAMS: Vendor tracking, catalog management, and
time management were handled through multiple channels, creating
inefficiency.
After SAMS: With QR-coded vendor catalogs, real-time
updates, and centralized communication, project management
became faster and more controlled.
Key Improvements:
- Faster team coordination
- Real-time project updates
- Better time management
- Integrated vendor catalog & communication
Amartya Architects — Nupur & Sahil (Surat)
Before SAMS: Teams struggled to maintain transparency and
consistency in project updates for clients.
After SAMS: Real-time updates improved transparency,
client satisfaction, and overall efficiency.
Key Improvements:
- Real-time project transparency
- Enhanced productivity
- Better internal collaboration
- Higher client satisfaction
ARB Designs — Ritika Chaudhary (Mumbai)
Before SAMS: Tracking attendance, expenses, and project
updates required managing multiple spreadsheets and manual
follow-ups.
After SAMS: SAMS automated tracking, eliminated
repetitive work, and improved communication.
Key Improvements:
- Organized project updates
- Automated attendance & expense logs
- Reduced manual follow-ups
- Improved communication between teams
Ar. Gavish Sahni (Studio Srijan)
Before SAMS: Data was scattered across multiple platforms
like Drive, WhatsApp, and Telegram, making it difficult to
analyse information or maintain a single source of truth.
After SAMS: Centralised all communications and data into
one software, allowing the studio to phase out redundant tools
and gain a confident, hands-on grip on their information.
Key Improvements:
- Consolidated data & software stack
- Integrated communication across platforms
- Ready-to-share data for clients and vendors
- Highly responsive and growth-oriented support
Ar. Mukul Goyal (Mukul Goyal Associates)
Before SAMS: The office operated as a traditional
architectural studio using manual timesheets and Excel forms.
There was no collective, "hands-on" information, making it
difficult to calculate the actual man-hours spent on projects
that often spanned several years.
After SAMS: Every staff member now feeds their daily
hours directly into the software. This transparency act as a
"mirror," allowing the team to see their own productivity, which
has encouraged them to work harder and complete tasks on time
rather than letting them carry over.
Key Improvements:
- Accurate man-hour calculation
- Real-time office monitoring
- Boosted staff accountability and motivation
- Integrated financial tracking
Ar. Vasanth Packirisamy (Firki Studio)
Before SAMS: The studio faced significant challenges with
manual task allocation among multiple partners. This lack of
coordination led to frequent work overlaps and major "leakages"
in time and productivity.
After SAMS: Implemented a structured "Sprint" methodology
tailored for the creative process. The team can now monitor
progress on the go via mobile, using an intuitive UI/UX to
manage workflows without the previous administrative
friction.
Key Improvements:
- Elimination of task overlap among multiple studio partners
- Reduced time leakage through the "Sprint" feature
- Mobile-first monitoring for easy access and reporting on the go
- Custom-built functionality based on direct architect feedback
Design Consortium: Nilanjan Bhowal (New Delhi)
Before SAMS: Manual coordination and documentation slowed project tracking.
After SAMS: Centralized dashboards and structured workflows improved execution.
Key Improvements:
- Streamlined workflow
- Better project visibility
- Improved client interaction
- Professional delivery
Abaxial Designs — Suparna Bhalla (New Delhi)
Before SAMS: Vendor tracking and updates were inefficient.
After SAMS: QR-coded catalogs and centralized communication improved control.
Key Improvements:
- Faster coordination
- Real-time updates
- Better time management
- Integrated vendor management
Amartya Architects — Nupur & Sahil (Surat)
Before SAMS: Lack of transparency in updates.
After SAMS: Real-time tracking improved efficiency and satisfaction.
Key Improvements:
- Project transparency
- Enhanced productivity
- Better collaboration
- Higher client satisfaction
ARB Designs — Ritika Chaudhary (Mumbai)
Before SAMS: Attendance and expense tracking required spreadsheets.
After SAMS: Automation eliminated repetitive work.
Key Improvements:
- Organized updates
- Automated tracking
- Reduced follow-ups
- Improved team communication
Ar. Gavish Sahni (Studio Srijan)
Before SAMS: Data was scattered across multiple platforms like Drive, WhatsApp, and Telegram, making it difficult to analyse information or maintain a single source of truth.
After SAMS: Centralised all communications and data into one software, allowing the studio to phase out redundant tools and gain a confident, hands-on grip on their information.
Key Improvements:
- Consolidated data & software stack
- Integrated communication across platforms
- Ready-to-share data for clients and vendors
- Highly responsive and growth-oriented support
Ar. Mukul Goyal (Mukul Goyal Associates)
Before SAMS: The office operated as a traditional architectural studio using manual timesheets and Excel forms. There was no collective, "hands-on" information, making it difficult to calculate the actual man-hours spent on projects that often spanned several years.
After SAMS: Every staff member now feeds their daily hours directly into the software. This transparency acts as a "mirror," allowing the team to see their own productivity, encouraging timely task completion.
Key Improvements:
- Accurate man-hour calculation
- Real-time office monitoring
- Boosted staff accountability and motivation
- Integrated financial tracking
Ar. Vasanth Packirisamy (Firki Studio)
Before SAMS: The studio faced significant challenges with manual task allocation among multiple partners, leading to overlaps and productivity loss.
After SAMS: Implemented a structured "Sprint" methodology with mobile-based monitoring and intuitive UI/UX for seamless workflow management.
Key Improvements:
- Elimination of task overlap among partners
- Reduced time leakage through Sprint feature
- Mobile-first monitoring and reporting
- Custom-built features from architect feedback
Here are some of the firms that rely on SAMS to run their operations:
Q1: What types of firms use SAMS?
Architecture firms, interior design studios, and design-build practices across India use SAMS to manage end-to-end operations.
Q2: Does SAMS work for multi-site or multi-team firms?
Yes, SAMS supports distributed teams with centralized tracking and visibility.
Q3: Can SAMS replace spreadsheets and WhatsApp for project management?
Yes, SAMS consolidates tasks, updates, vendors, billing, attendance, and documentation into one system.
Q4: Do clients need onboarding help?
We provide onboarding and support to ensure your team adopts SAMS smoothly.
